A violation warrant is not a new conviction, and since 2022 a judge's options on a technical violation are capped by statute. Austin Tomlinson is a Nashville probation violation attorney who handles revocation hearings in Davidson County.
Tennessee changed this in 2022, and a great deal of published advice still describes the old law. Under Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-311(d)(2), a judge shall not revoke probation on a felony offense based on one instance of technical violation or violations. That plural is deliberate and it matters: several technical violations charged together can amount to a single protected instance.
Beyond that first one, the statute caps what a judge may impose on a second or subsequent technical violation, escalating with each revocation rather than defaulting to the balance of the sentence.
This is the most useful thing to know walking into a violation hearing, and it is the part most people have never heard.
Written and reviewed by Austin Tomlinson, TN BPR #039453 Last updated
Everything turns on this one question. A technical violation is defined at § 40-35-311(g) as an act that violates the terms of probation but is not a new felony, a new Class A misdemeanor, a zero tolerance violation under the Department of Correction's community supervision sanction matrix, absconding, or contacting your victim in violation of a condition.
Missed appointments, a failed drug screen, unpaid fees, missed classes, a curfew problem. Those are often technical, though a failed screen can land inside the zero tolerance category depending on the matrix. Pick up a new felony or a new Class A misdemeanor, abscond, or contact the alleged victim, and the caps fall away entirely.
Note one wrinkle. The zero tolerance category is defined by a Department of Correction matrix rather than by the statute, which means it is a document that can change without the legislature. Whether a particular allegation lands inside it is worth having a Nashville probation violation attorney check rather than assuming.
| Revocation | Maximum the judge may impose |
|---|---|
| First revocation | 15 days |
| Second revocation | 30 days |
| Third revocation | 90 days |
| Fourth or subsequent | The remainder of the sentence |
Read the conditions on this carefully. The ladder applies to probation for a felony offense and to a second or subsequent technical violation. There is no equivalent statutory ladder for misdemeanor probation. The statute describes this as a temporary revocation, and it counts revocations rather than violations, so where someone sits on the ladder is not the same as how many times they have been written up. How prior revocations get counted is still being worked out in the Court of Criminal Appeals.
There is also an off-ramp from the ladder entirely. Section 40-35-311(e)(1)(B) lets the judge resentence you to probation for the remainder of the unexpired term with a community-based alternative, instead of imposing any of the days above. That is a better outcome than fifteen days and it is statutory.
A violation starts with a warrant, or for a technical violation brought by a probation officer, the judge may issue a criminal summons instead. At the hearing you must be present, you are entitled to counsel, and you have the right to introduce testimony. The judge decides by a preponderance of the evidence.
That standard is the thing to understand. This is not beyond a reasonable doubt. It is more likely than not, decided by a judge rather than a jury. That is a genuinely lower bar for the State, which is why these hearings are not won by waiting to see what the State puts on. They are won by contesting the specific proof and by putting something affirmative in front of the judge, which is the work a Nashville probation violation attorney should be doing before the hearing date.
On finding a violation, the judge may revoke probation in full or in part, or return you to probation for the remainder of the term. Partial revocation is expressly authorized, which is often the realistic target.
Since 2021, Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-310(a) allows a judge to give credit against the original judgment for the time successfully served on probation before the violation, or a portion of that time. It is discretionary, not automatic.
Before that change there was no such provision at all, and someone who completed four years of a six-year probation could be revoked to the full six. The credit now exists, but because the statute says may and allows a portion, it has to be argued for. That argument is one of the more valuable things a lawyer does at a revocation hearing, and it is entirely lost if nobody raises it.
If you are on community corrections rather than probation, the protections above do not apply directly to you. Under Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-36-106(e)(4), on revocation the court may resentence you to any appropriate alternative, including incarceration, for any period of time up to the maximum sentence provided for the offense committed, less time actually served in the program. The resentencing still has to comply with the sentencing principles in § 40-35-210, so the statutory ceiling is not the likely outcome, but it is the exposure.
Read that again, because it is the part that catches people. Probation revocation reinstates the sentence you already have. Community corrections revocation can expose you to the statutory maximum for the offense, which may be considerably more than what you were originally sentenced to.
The 2022 reforms did not reach community corrections. There are no graduated caps there and no statutory definition of a technical violation. The first thing to establish on any violation is which one you are actually on.
The caps only apply to technical violations. Arguing an allegation into that category, out of the five exclusions, and where possible into a single instance rather than several, is frequently the whole case.
The ladder runs on prior revocations, not write-ups. Establishing the correct position on it can be the difference between fifteen days and the balance of a sentence.
A failed screen has a chain of custody and a confirmation method. A missed appointment has records. Preponderance is a lower standard, not an absent one.
Unpaid fees, missed classes and transportation failures often reflect circumstances rather than defiance, and that distinction can be documented.
Credit for time successfully served is discretionary. It is granted when it is asked for and supported, and lost when it is not raised.
Restarting treatment, catching up on payments or re-enrolling in a class before the hearing changes what a judge is looking at. Timing matters.
A lot of technical violations trace back to something treatable. Missed appointments, a failed screen, trouble holding a schedule. Where that connects to a service-related condition, it belongs in front of the judge as context, with records behind it, rather than being left to look like indifference.
Austin is a veteran. He raises it, documents it, and puts a concrete plan in front of the court instead of asking for leniency in the abstract.
Veterans Defense OptionsDavidson County runs a dedicated Veterans Treatment Court. Participation comes as a condition of probation or through a diversion program, depending on the case.
A service-connected condition explains a pattern a judge would otherwise read as refusal. It has to be raised with records.
Judges respond to a concrete plan already underway. Starting it before the hearing is worth more than promising it at one.
The 2022 limits are statutory and they are frequently left on the table. They only help if someone raises them.
Credit for time already served is discretionary. Asking for it, with support, is how it gets granted.
The two carry very different exposure. Establishing which one applies is the first question, not an afterthought.
Not for a single technical violation on felony probation. Section 40-35-311(d)(2) says a judge shall not revoke on one instance of technical violation or violations, and that plural matters because several violations charged together can be one instance. Beyond that, the caps at § 40-35-311(e)(1)(A) limit a second or subsequent technical violation to 15 days on a first revocation, 30 on a second and 90 on a third. Only at a fourth or subsequent revocation does the remainder of the sentence come back into play. The judge can also skip the days entirely and resentence you to probation with a community-based alternative.
Section 40-35-311(g) defines it as an act violating the terms of probation that is not a new felony, a new Class A misdemeanor, a zero tolerance violation under the Department of Correction matrix, absconding, or contacting your victim in violation of a condition. Missed appointments, failed screens and unpaid fees ordinarily fall inside the definition. The five exclusions are what take a case outside it.
A preponderance of the evidence, decided by the judge. It is a lower standard than beyond a reasonable doubt and there is no jury. That said, the State still has to prove it, and violation allegations frequently rest on records and testimony that do not hold up when actually examined.
You can. Since 2021, § 40-35-310(a) lets a judge credit the time successfully served on probation before the violation, or a portion of it, against the original judgment. It is discretionary rather than automatic, so it has to be asked for and supported. Before 2021 there was no such provision at all.
That takes you outside the technical violation caps. A new felony or a new Class A misdemeanor lets the judge revoke and order the original judgment executed. Credit for time successfully served on probation is still available though, because § 40-35-311(e)(2) permits reducing the sentence by that amount. You now have two cases running at once and what happens in one drives the other, so they have to be handled together rather than separately.
Worth confirming, because the exposure is very different. Probation revocation reinstates your existing sentence and is subject to the technical violation caps. Community corrections revocation under § 40-36-106(e)(4) allows resentencing up to the maximum sentence for the offense, less time actually served in the program, with no graduated caps. Your judgment order will say which one you are on.
For a technical violation brought by a probation officer, the judge has discretion to issue a criminal summons rather than a warrant under § 40-35-311(a)(1)(B). That option did not exist before the reforms. For anything outside the technical category, a warrant is the usual route.
Talk to a lawyer first, same day if you can. There is often preparation worth doing before you appear, including restarting treatment, catching up on payments, or gathering records that reframe what the judge is looking at. Walking in without that groundwork gives up most of the available leverage.
Each county page covers the court structure, the specialty courts and the local rules of that county. Each city page covers which court actually has your case, how far away it is, and what that city's own court can and cannot do. The areas served page lays all of it out in one place. If your city is not listed, call anyway — these are the places Austin appears most often, not the limits of where he goes.
Every day you wait is a day the prosecution is working and you are not. Call Patriot Law and get a straight read on where you actually stand.
| Monday | 9:00 AM – 7:00 PM |
| Tuesday | 9:00 AM – 7:00 PM |
| Wednesday | 9:00 AM – 7:00 PM |
| Thursday | 9:00 AM – 7:00 PM |
| Friday | 9:00 AM – 7:00 PM |
| Saturday | 10:00 AM – 5:00 PM |
| Sunday | Closed |